The Case for Community Banks
First Trust Advisors
By Ryan Issakainen
May 22, 2012
Today,
it is the financials sector that causes the most visceral reaction for
many investors, as they recall the bursting of the US real estate bubble
and subsequent decimation of many banks and other financial
institutions in late 2008-early 2009. More recently, regulatory
pressures combined with macroeconomic concerns regarding the strength of
the global economy have produced additional anxiety for investors.
However, as the US economic recovery continues to unfold, the time to consider investing in community banks may be upon us.
In addition to compelling valuations, in our opinion, many of the
fundamental drivers of community bank earnings have shown significant
improvement, and signal potential opportunity ahead for investors
willing to overcome emotional biases against the banking industry.
Net Interest Margins are Stable
Net
interest margin (NIM), which measures the difference between interest
paid to depositors and interest received from borrowers, divided by
total interest-earning assets, is one of the most important drivers of
community bank earnings. Since banks’ borrowing costs are generally
tied to short-term interest rates, and lending is generally tied to
longer-term rates, the shape of the yield curve has a large impact on
NIMs. While the positive slope of the yield curve has flattened
somewhat over the past five quarters, smaller banks have had an
advantage over larger banks when it comes to maintaining, and slightly
expanding, net interest margins. For example, the average NIM for the
Nasdaq OMX ABA Community Bank Index has trended slightly higher from
3.77% on 12/31/10 to 3.85% on 3/30/12, while the average NIM for the
S&P 500 Financials Sector Index dropped from 3.04% on 12/31/10 to
2.66% on 03/30/12.[1]
If the US economic recovery continues to gain a footing in the quarters
ahead, NIMs may further expand as pressure is placed on longer-term
interest rates, even as the Federal Reserve remains committed to
maintaining a low interest rate policy until late 2014.
Credit Results are Improving
As
the financial crisis unfolded in 2008-2009, substantial depreciation in
home values plus a spike in the US unemployment rate exposed lax
underwriting standards in the banking industry during the boom times.
The resulting credit losses overwhelmed earnings and threatened the
solvency of many banks. A dramatic tightening of lending standards
followed, as banks sought to hoard capital and raise the overall credit
quality of their loan portfolios. These efforts, combined with the
gradual “rolling off” of bad loans, have resulted in a smaller
proportion of non-performing loans to total loans for the Nasdaq OMX ABA
Community Bank Index, which declined from 2.5% on 9/30/10 to 1.5% on
3/30/12 (see Chart 1)[2].
Chart 1
These
improvements have also eased the pressure on banks to increase their
bad debt reserves, providing room for banks to deploy capital more
productively. In fact, from 12/31/10 to 3/31/12, the average quarterly
provision for loan loss to total loans for the Nasdaq OMX ABA Community
Bank Index decreased from 0.31% to 0.14%.[3]
Encouraging Loan Growth Trends
A
resurgence in demand for new loans from both businesses and consumers,
combined with credit standards that are beginning to relax, points to
potential loan growth for US banks in the months ahead. According to
the most recent Federal Reserve Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on
Bank Lending Practices (released on April 30, 2012), the net percentage
of domestic banks reporting stronger demand for Commercial &
Industrial loans increased in April for loans to both large and small
borrowers, continuing a trend that began early last year (see chart 2).
Additionally, the net percentage of respondents reporting stronger
demand for commercial real estate loans increased to 39.7%, the highest
level since 1998.

Chart 2
Why Community Banks?
One
important feature of most community banks versus larger financial
institutions is their inherent concentration on domestic/local area
banking, versus international banking. As a result, the performance
of community banks tends to be more sensitive to the domestic economy,
and may be less impacted by international affairs, such as the current
economic and political turmoil in Europe.
Another
emerging trend that undergirds the investment thesis for smaller banks
is the recent surge in mergers & acquisitions in the US banking
industry. While the second half of 2011 was relatively light on
M&A activity, the first quarter brought a sharp increase among US
banks, as year-over-year M&A deal volume increased by 20.4%, and the
average premium at which deals were announced was 79.4%.[4]
While increased regulatory pressure and size limitations may prevent
some of the largest banks from seeking new M&A deals, strong
incentives remains for the next tier of regional banks to seek
acquisitions of smaller community banks in order to tap into an existing
base of customers and deposits.
As the US economy and the banking industry continue to recover, we believe it may be time for investors to consider the long-term opportunity offered by the First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA). This ETF provides diversification for investors among 106 community banks from across the nation, thereby providing geographical diversification that is lacking in many individual community banks. If positive trends regarding net interest margin expansion, improvements to credit quality, and increased loan growth continue to materialize, we believe community banks are well positioned for growth in the years ahead.
[1] According to Bloomberg.
[2] According to Bloomberg.
[3] According to Bloomberg.
[4] According to Bloomberg.
(c) First Trust Advisors

