The Economy: Worst Five Years Since the Depression
Halbert Wealth Management
By Gary Halbert
February 13, 2013
IN THIS ISSUE:
1.¬†¬†Worst Five Years Since the Great Depression
2.¬†¬†Half of Americans on the Edge of Financial Ruin
3.¬†¬†‚ÄúFiscal Cliff II‚ÄĚ ‚Äď Sequestration: Here We Go Again
4.¬†¬†Treasury Bond Bubble: Yields Jump 32%!
5.¬† Bonds: It‚Äôs Not Too Late to Protect Yourself
Tonight, President Obama will give the first State of the Union address of his second term as President of the United States. You can bet that the speech will be full of glowing rhetoric and success stories from his first four years in office.
What you will definitely¬†NOT¬†hear from him tonight is the fact that the US economy just recorded the¬†worst five years¬†since the Great Depression. That¬†is¬†what you will read below. While the many facts and figures below are disappointing, even depressing, Americans need to know the truth about the real state of our economy and our union.
Consider what follows as a rebuttal to President Obama‚Äôs speech tonight. Feel free to forward this to as many people as you wish.
Worst Five Years Since the Great Depression
As of the end of 2012, the United States has experienced the worst five-year period of economic growth since 1928-1932 and the start of the Great Depression. Following the global financial crisis and recession in 2008, and based on the historical pattern of American economic recovery since the Depression years, the United States should have been experiencing broad and significant economic and job growth by the third year of the recovery (2011) at the latest.
Place the blame where you wish, but not since 1928 through 1932 have the American people been more significantly worse off at the end of a five-year period than they were at the beginning. Here are the telling statistics:
A)¬†Since January 2008 the employment age population has increased by 11.7 million, yet there are¬†three million fewer Americans employed today¬†‚Äď 146.3 million in January 2008 vs. 143.3 million in December 2012. Factoring in the population growth and the 2008 labor participation rate, the real unemployment rate for December 2012 would be¬†11.4%¬†as compared to 4.9% in December of 2007.
B)¬†At the end of 2007, the median household income was $54,489 (inflation adjusted). By January 2012, it had dropped to¬†$50,054 ‚Äď¬†a decline of over 8% and the most precipitous plunge over a similar period since the Census Bureau started tracking that statistic. While American incomes were rapidly eroding, the cost of living continued to rise as the commodity price index (basket of food, fuel and other essential commodities) rose 20% from 2007 to 2012.
C)¬†The average net worth of all American households from 2007 through the beginning of 2011 took a nose-drive, dropping by nearly¬†40%, according to a study from the Federal Reserve that was released in June 2012. About three-fourths of the decline in family net worth was due to the devastating collapse in the value of their homes. Median home prices plunged from $248,000 in 2007 to $173,000 in 2012, a decline of 30%.
D)¬†In December 2007, 26.5 million Americans were on food stamps at a cost of $30 billion annually. As of November 2012, the USDA reported that¬†47.7 million¬†were accessing the food stamp program, an increase of 80%, at an annual cost in excess of $70 billion. Furthermore, the government calculated that 38.0 million Americans were living in poverty at the end of 2007, a poverty rate of 13.0%; however, by the beginning of 2012,¬†49.7 million¬†were living in poverty and the rate had increased to 16.1%.
E)¬†The nation‚Äôs growth in Gross Domestic Product over the past five years has also been the most anemic since the Depression years. The GDP (adjusted for inflation) in 2007 was $15.5 trillion; in 2012 it is estimated to be almost $16.0 trillion, a difference of just under $0.5 trillion ($500 billion). That comes to total growth of only 3% over five years, or an annual rate of a minuscule 0.6%.
F)¬†While the nation‚Äôs growth rate has been stagnant, spending by governments at all levels (federal, state and local) has increased dramatically from $4.9 trillion in 2007 to $6.2 trillion in 2012, a jump of 26.5%. This increase is driven largely by the federal government as it has increased its spending by nearly 41% over this period. This has resulted in the total national debt rising from $9.2 trillion at the beginning of 2008 to¬†$16.45 trillion¬†as of today, a staggering 79% increase.¬†That is over 100% of GDP!
G)¬†There is one group that has fared well over the past five years:¬†federal bureaucrats¬†‚Äď this according to the US Office of Personnel Management. Since December of 2007, there has been an increase of 4% in the number of federal workers (not including the military) ‚Äď 2.70 million vs. 2.82 million today ‚Äď this despite the worst recession and financial crisis since the Great Depression.
Further, the average total compensation for federal government employees increased nearly 9% to$126,200¬†from 2007 to 2011. Additionally, the number of government workers earning more than $150,000 has more than doubled over this same period. By comparison, the average total compensation for those in the private sector was $62,100 in 2011, only 49% of what the average federal employee realized that same year (US Bureau of Economic Analysis).
Since the Great Depression, recessions in America have lasted an average of¬†10 months, with the longest previously at 16 months. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, the latest recession began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009, the longest since the Depression at 18 months. Yet here we are 62 months after the recession began and there is hardly any recovery at all.
As noted earlier, you can place the blame wherever you wish. President Obama places all of the blame on former President Bush. Apparently, the majority of American voters agree since they elected Obama to a second term by a comfortable margin last November. However, I suggest you read an¬†excellent article¬†by Forbes columnist¬†Peter Ferrara¬†who does a great job explaining why our economy is still so weak. It is the first link in SPECIAL ARTICLES below.
Half of Americans on the Edge of Financial Ruin
In the past few years, Americans have certainly learned a thing or two about how quickly disaster can strike. With each new crisis ‚Äď Hurricane Sandy, the housing bust, the credit crisis, stock market crashes, etc. ‚Äď we‚Äôre faced with the harsh realization that many of us simply aren‚Äôt prepared for the worst.
A sobering new report by the Corporation for Enterprise Development shows that nearly half of US households ‚Äď¬†132.1 million people¬†‚Äď don‚Äôt have enough savings to weather emergencies or finance long-term needs like college tuition, health care, housing, etc.
According to the Assets & Opportunity Scorecard, these people¬†wouldn‚Äôt last three months¬†if their income suddenly stopped. More than 30% don‚Äôt even have a savings account, and another 8% don‚Äôt bank at all.
We‚Äôre not just talking about people who live at or below the poverty line, either. Plenty of middle class folks have joined the ranks of the ‚Äúworking poor,‚ÄĚ struggling right alongside families scraping by on food stamps and other forms of public assistance.
More than one-quarter of households earning $55,465 to $90,000 annually have less than three months of savings. And another quarter of households are considered ‚Äúnet worth asset poor,‚ÄĚ meaning that the few assets they have, such as a savings account or durable assets like a home, business or car, are overwhelmed by their debts, the study says.
One of the prolonged reasons consumers have consistently struggled to make ends meet has more to do with larger economic issues than whether or not they can balance a checkbook. As noted above, the average net worth of all American households from 2007 through the beginning of 2011 took a nose-drive, dropping by nearly¬†40%, according to a study from the Federal Reserve that was released in June 2012. During the same time, the cost of basic necessities like housing, food, and education have soared.
And wherever consumers can‚Äôt cope with costs, they continue to rely on plastic. The average borrower carries more than¬†$10,700¬†in credit card debt. One in five households still rely on high-risk financial services that target low-income consumers.
‚ÄúFiscal Cliff II‚ÄĚ ‚Äď Sequestration: Here We Go Again
The White House and GOP lawmakers are getting ready, once again, to¬†not¬†work together on taxes and spending cuts. As the March 1 sequestration deadline looms for the start of $85.3 billion in automatic budget cuts, the old brinksmanship is back.
Democrats will press for additional tax hikes on wealthier Americans, even though Republicans declared that this option is now off the table, after agreeing to roughly $700 billion in new revenues (ie ‚Äď higher taxes on wealthy Americans) over the next 10 years as part of the New Year‚Äôs Day fiscal cliff deal. President Obama had leverage then, and the Republicans basically had to cave in.
But this time, President Obama lacks a critical piece of leverage. The GOP joined with Democrats on the recent tax increase only to protect middle-class Americans from tax rates that were set to surge for everyone. Their bargain prevented higher taxes on families with incomes below $450,000.
Still, the president and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid are undeterred. Both announced over the weekend that any part of a plan to reduce the deficit must include new revenues (ie ‚Äď higher taxes), such as eliminating the ‚Äúcarried interest‚ÄĚ tax rate for investment managers and other lucrative loopholes and deductions.
In an interview with CBS News before the Super Bowl, President Obama declared:¬†‚ÄúThere is no doubt we need additional revenue [taxes], coupled with smart spending reductions in order to bring down our deficit, and we can do it in a gradual way so that it doesn't have a huge impact.‚ÄĚ¬†He knows that‚Äôs not true.
Also, Obama didn‚Äôt spell out how he plans to sway the GOP to his way of thinking. After the fiscal cliff tax deal, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said,¬†‚ÄúThe tax issue is finished, over, completed.‚ÄĚ¬†What the Republicans can‚Äôt seem to get through their heads is the fact that the ‚Äėtax issue‚Äô will¬†never be finished¬†with President Obama and most Democrats.
The stalemate could have serious real world consequences in a matter of weeks. As noted above, more than $85 billion of across-the-board spending cuts ‚Äď half in defense and half in domestic programs ‚Äď are set to kick in automatically beginning March 1 unless Congress and the administration take action.¬†Here we go again!
Treasury Bond Bubble: Yields Unexpectedly Jump 32%!
Last summer I became very concerned that Treasury bond yields were overshooting on the downside, and that the risk of a sharp upward correction in rates could happen at any time. In August of last year, I sent clients and subscribers a 16-page¬†SPECIAL REPORT¬†entitled:¬†How to Avoid the¬†BURSTING of the Bond Market Bubble.
In the Report, I warned about the growing risks in the bond markets, especially in long-dated Treasuries. I warned about how investors were stampeding into T-bond mutual funds (a record $310 billion in the last two years), not realizing that they were taking on some huge risks if long-term interest rates started to rise. Remember, when T-bond yields rise, the price of those bonds declines accordingly.
I recommended that investors consider moving some money into System Research‚Äôs¬†Equity Alternative Program¬†that invests ‚Äď long¬†and¬†short ‚Äď in Treasury bond mutual funds. Some people argued that T-bond yields could not move significantly higher, especially after the Fed‚Äôs September announcement that it would begin buying¬†$45 billion a month¬†in new Treasury bonds¬†indefinitely¬†in the hopes of stimulating the economy.
Because of the recent bold move by the Fed, very few readers took me up on my advice to allocate some money to the¬†Equity Alternative Program.¬†But despite the Fed‚Äôs unprecedented action, long-term rates still rose significantly recently. Take a look below.
The yield on the 30-year Treasury bond actually hit its all-time low on July 25 last year at only¬†2.44%¬†as you can see above. Since then, it has spiked to¬†3.22%.¬†That‚Äôs a jump of¬†32%¬†despite the record monthly Treasury bond buying by the Fed. Notice also how much the T-bond yield has jumped just since the presidential election in November‚Ä¶ Hmmm.
The case I made in my August Special Report was that¬†bond yields could turn higher at any time,¬†even before the Fed announced its huge T-bond buying program in September. But now that the Fed is implementing the $45 billion a month in T-bond purchases, that raises another question:¬†When will the Fed end these huge purchases?¬†No one knows when, but they will end at some point.
And that will almost certainly cause another jump in Treasury bond yields. If so, investors in Treasury bonds could suffer even larger losses than in the last six months as yields have risen.
Are We Nearing the Tipping Point on US Debt?
My contention in my August Special Report was that the day is coming when investors will demand higher rates to loan the government 30-year money. The fact that yields have jumped 32% in the last six months ‚Äď for no obvious reason ‚Äď suggests that we are coming closer to the tipping point when interest rates rise significantly higher.
There are plenty of liberal arguments that there is virtually¬†no limit¬†on how much debt the US can rack-up without a bond market revolt. These arguments are always weak in that they assume there will never be a day when investors begin to worry that they may not be repaid all of their money that they loan to the government.
To them, a government debt default is not possible, at least not in the US. I am not arguing that the US government will default on its debt. What I am arguing is that we have reached the point where investors will demand higher returns on the money they loan to Uncle Sam. How else can you explain why T-bond yields have jumped so much, especially since the election?
Our national debt has ballooned from $10 trillion when Obama took office to over $16 trillion in four years. It could approach $20 trillion by the time he leaves office.¬†This debt will never be fully paid off.¬†I get criticized every time I say this, but that‚Äôs what I believe. I challenge anyone to give me a realistic scenario showing how this debt is ever repaid!
Investors continue to buy US Treasury debt because they are confident the US will never default. And maybe the US will never default. But the other option is to¬†inflate and further debase the US dollar. Either course is bearish for bonds!
Bonds: It‚Äôs Not Too Late to Protect Yourself
The bottom line is this:¬†We are drawing closer to the tipping point where investors demand much higher returns on money they loan to the US government.¬†It‚Äôs only a matter of time before long-term rates move¬†significantly higher¬†in my opinion. The 32% jump in 30-year Treasury rates over the last six months was not expected by virtually anyone. What happens next? Could this trend continue? It is certainly possible.
My advice remains the same. If you are overweight in ‚Äúlong-only‚ÄĚ taxable bonds and bond funds, you should seriously consider a¬†long/short bond strategy¬†such as the¬†Equity Alternative Program¬†that has the potential to make money whichever way Treasury bond yields move. The minimum investment is only $25,000.
Or consider our¬†‚ÄúLegacy Long/Short Bond Portfolio‚ÄĚ¬†which combines two successful bond money managers that invest both long¬†and¬†short as market trends dictate. The minimum investment is only $50,000.
* As always, past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.
Treasury bond yields have already jumped by almost one-third when virtually no one expected it. This could well continue, whether you believe it or not. No one can predict the future, so you had better be prepared.
If you still do not want to pursue an actively-managed bond strategy that may protect your bond holdings from rising interest rates ‚Äď and with the¬†potential to profit from higher rates¬†‚Äď then you may want to consider at least lightening up and moving some of your bond exposure to the safety of cash.
As always, feel free to call us at¬†800-348-3601¬†to ask any questions you may have. One of our salaried (non-commission) Investment Consultants will be happy to discuss your situation with you, with no pressure or obligation. Our only objective is to help you make the right decision for¬†you, whether you invest with us or not.
Gary D. Halbert
(c) Halbert Wealth Management