ACTIONABLE ADVICE FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORS: Newsletters and Commentaries Focused on Investment Strategy

Follow us on
 Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  RSS Feed

    Last 14 days

Most Popular Articles


Most Popular Commentaries

    Last 12 Months

Most Popular Articles


Most Popular Commentaries



More by the Same Author

Economic Insights
   Housing
   Inflation
   Quantitative Easing
Equities
   Growth
Fixed Income
   Mortgage-backed
Global Markets
   Global
Investments
   Investments
Specialty Investments
   REITs

Housing Recovery? Try Long Convalescence
iShares Blog
By Russ Koesterich
September 18, 2012


Display as PDF     Print    Email Article    Remind Me Later

Bookmark and Share

The US Federal Reserve’s decision to expand quantitative easing is dramatic, but we don’t think it will have a significant impact on the US housing market. While the extra liquidity is supportive of risky assets in the very near-term, lower mortgage rates are not a game-changer for a consumer still struggling with little income growth and too much debt.

Certainly, the prospect of buying another $40 billion a month of mortgage-backed securities will help keep home-loan rates low for a long time, but they were already low. In July, a conventional 30-year mortgage could be had for 3.75%. It’s not clear that a potential 50 basis-point reduction in mortgage rates will spur a housing renaissance. Our view remains that, while the housing market is clearly on the mend, it’s going to be a long convalescence.

Yet, home building has rebounded. This summer, housing starts rose to an annualized rate of 750,000, the highest since the fall of 2008. Homes have become significantly more affordable: cheaper to buy and more lucrative to rent out. That said, housing still faces several headwinds.

First, even with the rebound in home building, housing starts are still barely half of their 50-year average. Second, slower population growth and household formation are likely to lead to less demand. Third, there is still a significant shadow inventory of unsold homes: properties that are in foreclosure, but have not yet been sold; dwelling mortgages in arrears; and real estate that owners are delaying putting on the market until prices improve.

Perhaps most importantly, consumer debt levels are still high by historic standards, suggesting that households may be reluctant to take on additional debt, even if mortgage rates are low. All of this suggests that while home prices have probably bottomed, they are likely to remain flat, at least in inflation adjusted terms, for several more years. This pattern is consistent with what has happened in other countries that have experienced housing bubbles.

The bottom line: we remain neutral on housing related stocks, including real estate investment trusts (REITs), because it will be several more years before we return to a normal environment for the housing sector.

Source: Bloomberg

Russ Koesterich, CFA, is the iShares Global Chief Investment Strategist and a regular contributor to the iShares Blog. You can find more of his posts here.

In addition to the normal risks associated with investing, narrowly focused investments typically exhibit higher volatility. Real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) are subject to changes in economic conditions, credit risk and interest rate fluctuations.

(c) iShares Blog

http://isharesblog.com/

 

 

Display as PDF     Print    Email Article    Remind Me Later
 
Remember, if you have a question or comment, send it to .
Website by the Boston Web Company