Unconventional Policies and Capital Flows
By Ben Emons
February 8, 2013
Although quantitative easing has grabbed the headlines, a number of central banks around the world have enacted other extraordinary measures in attempts to manage their economies. The Swiss National Bank (SNB), for example, adopted an exchange rate peg versus the euro while increasing its foreign exchange reserves to almost 80% of Swiss GDP. Sweden’s central bank, the Riksbank, established explicit policy rate guidance more than five years ago. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) has an inflation target range and has applied “flexible inflation targeting”’ for quite some time. And the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) use exchange-rate management to set monetary policy.
Each of these central banks has its own specific mandate, yet they have something in common: Their domestic asset markets are viewed as “safe harbors.” This phenomenon intensified during the European sovereign debt crisis and continues today. With increased capital inflows came high foreign ownership in their government bond markets, excessive exchange-rate appreciation, and rising equity and property markets. As shown in Figure 1, the real estate sector in some of these countries has become “bubbly.” As a result, the central banks in these economies may have to take more unconventional measures to stem the flow of capital and prevent asset bubbles.
These banks now have to walk a tight rope, balancing bubbling asset markets against slow-growing economies and appreciating currencies, as shown in Figure 2. Raising interest rates in an effort to deflate their asset bubbles would likely attract greater capital inflows and drive currencies even higher. Instead, central banks are left with the typical stabilizers to tame asset price inflation − more capital controls through stamp and indirect taxes, levies and negative deposit rates – and/or managing the real effective exchange rate. Under pegged or managed exchange-rate policy, central banks typically tolerate higher domestic inflation for periods of time in order to slow capital flows, cool off asset prices and slow real effective exchange-rate appreciation.
Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results. All investments contain risk and may lose value. Sovereign securities are generally backed by the issuing government; portfolios that invest in such securities are not guaranteed and will fluctuate in value. Investing in foreign-denominated and/or -domiciled securities may involve heightened risk due to currency fluctuations, and economic and political risks, which may be enhanced in emerging markets. Currency rates may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time and may reduce the returns of a portfolio.
This material contains the opinions of the authors but not necessarily those of PIMCO and such opinions are subject to change without notice. This material has been distributed for informational purposes only. Forecasts, estimates, and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary research and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. PIMCO and YOUR GLOBAL INVESTMENT AUTHORITY are trademarks or registered trademarks of Allianz Asset Management of America L.P. and Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, respectively, in the United States and throughout the world. ©2013, PIMCO.