ACTIONABLE ADVICE FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORS: Newsletters and Commentaries Focused on Investment Strategy

Follow us on
 Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  RSS Feed

    Last 14 days

Most Popular Articles


Most Popular Commentaries

    Last 12 Months

Most Popular Articles


Most Popular Commentaries



More by the Same Author

Economic Insights
   Employment
   Inflation
Equities
   Value
Investment Strategies
   Investment Strategies
Investments
   Investments
Market Insights
   Fixed Income
Practice Management
   Fees

ProVise Bullets
ProVise Management Group
By Ray Ferrara
September 28, 2012


Display as PDF     Print    Email Article    Remind Me Later

Bookmark and Share

- The median household income adjusted for inflation is now around $50,000 for a “typical” American family. This is 8% below the all-time high, which was set in 2007. Driving these results, as reported by the Census Bureau, was the fact that 80% of Americans saw their household incomes decline, or at a minimum, remain the same, while the top 20% saw their incomes increase by 1.6%. Depending upon which side of the political spectrum you are on, an argument could be made for the policies of either President Obama or Governor Romney. Here’s our take on these results, however: Those who have the skills, and therefore the greatest opportunity for income, enjoyed an increase of 1.6%, and significantly lower unemployment, than those who do not. This speaks not only to the training of the American workforce and its need to be upgraded, but also equally to the importance of increasing the education of America’s children. A few weeks ago we reported about a shrinking middle class and this report only adds consensus to that discussion. (Source: U.S. Census Bureau)

- The election is about five weeks away and almost all the news will be focused on it, but as soon as it is over, Congress needs to deal with a myriad of issues during the lame duck session. The White House recently sent Congress a line item explanation of what will happen should the automatic budget cuts go into play on January 1st. This should be enough to give everyone in Congress something to think about. The automatic cuts will drop the military budget by 9.4% and domestic programs by a total of 8.2%. The following are just a few of the anticipated reductions. Various education programs would be cut by $2.3 billion and hospital insurance would fall $5.6 billion, including a 2% cut in Medicare. Military spending will be cut by something just north of $11 billion. While there are a lot of arguments that can be made to support any of these cuts, it’s the arbitrary nature in which they are applied which has most people worried. Of course, it doesn’t trouble us that salaries and expenses in the House of Representatives alone would fall by about $101 million.

CORRECTION: Election Day is Tuesday, November 6th – NOT November 7th. We apologize for any confusion caused by including the wrong date in our September 14th Bullets.

- For the past several months we have talked about the confidence that is growing among home builders in the U.S. That trend is not waning, as the National Association of Homebuilders/Wells Fargo Sentiment Index hit 40 in September, making it the highest it has been since June of 2006, even before the economic downturn. There are still those who argue that conditions are not great – but that is slowly changing and the change could be happening at a very important time for the economy. In fact, the Index not only went up, but many of its component parts are accelerating quickly. The decision by the Federal Reserve to buy $40 billion per month in mortgages is not going to hurt things going forward. Having said that, according to a recent Associated Press article, new home purchase loans declined by 5% in 2011 and re-finance loans declined 13%. This is the lowest level of home mortgages being originated in 16 years.

- So, is there an easy formula to determine the size of the nest egg you need when you enter retirement? The answer obviously is “no”, but there are some rules of thumb you can follow. Let’s assume you want to increase your spending power by a 3% rate of inflation and that your portfolio achieves an annual return of +5%, (ignoring any taxes and not illustrative of any specific investment or portfolio). Obviously, none of this is guaranteed. For every $1,000 per month you would like to have for a 20 year period of time at the end of which the portfolio would be zero, you would need a lump sum of $196,000. Thus, if you wanted $10,000 per month, it would require you to have a lump sum of $1.96 million. If you feel like you have really good genes and expect to live 30 years in retirement, then the present value of that stream of money would need to be $269,000 per $1,000, or $2.69 million for $10,000 per month. If you keep everything the same, but assume a 6% positive return, the lump sum required is $179,000 per $1,000 for a 20 year pay-out and $237,000 for a 30 year pay-out. (Source: BTN Research)

- Among all of the other things retirees need to worry about are student loans. No, we don’t mean personal student loans – we mean the ones they co-signed for their children or grandchildren. According to the New York Federal Reserve, $36 billion of student debt is owed by Americans age 60 and over. While it only represents about 4% of the $914 billion of outstanding student loans, it is enough to cause a delay in retirement plans or make retirement less fun.

- So the rich really do get richer, at least if you are listed in the Forbes 400 Richest People in America. According to Forbes, the average net worth for these 400 people increased $400 million to a record $4.2 billion, with two-thirds of them adding to their wealth. Leading the list was Bill Gates with $66 billion, an increase of $7 billion this past year. Warren Buffett was in the number two spot, with $46 billion. In third place was Larry Ellison of Oracle, who enjoyed a gain of $8 billion, increasing his total to $41 billion thanks mainly to the performance of Oracle stock.

- Is the stock market a predictor of who will win the White House on November 6th? If we go back to 1928, encompassing the last 21 Presidential elections, we find that the results were split about evenly between the Democrats, who won 11 times, and the Republicans, who won 10 times. Interestingly, in the years that Republicans won, on a total return basis, the S&P 500 gained 14.8% on average. When the Democrats won, the S&P gained only 4.9% on average. Given that we are up about 16% as of the end of September, does it bode well for the Republicans? Obviously, the year is not over and there are definitely headwinds to be overcome during the last quarter of the year. (Source: BTN Research)

- Because of the debacle of 2008 and early 2009, many investors have become much more conservative than they were before that time. This is not surprising. On the other hand, some investors have become too conservative, especially those who are near or in retirement. With today’s low interest rates, after taxes and inflation, those retirees are likely moving backwards in purchasing power. If we ignore taxes and only look at inflation from 1991 to 2011, we see that, over this two decade period, there has been a 39% loss of purchasing power. For those living on a fixed income or whose investment portfolios are too conservative this causes a reduction in their standard of living. (Source: Department of Labor)

As always, we encourage you to give us a call if you would like to discuss anything further. We will visit again soon. Proudly and successfully serving our clients for over 25 years.

RAY, KIM, ERIC, BRUCE, LOU, NANCY, TINA, and JON

©9/28/12 ProVise Management Group, LLC

This material represents an assessment of the market and economic environment at a specific point in time. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions, the contents may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. It is not intended to be a forecast of future events, or a guarantee of future results. Forward looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by ProVise), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in these Bullets, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective or current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in these Bullets serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from ProVise. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Information is based on data gathered from what we believe are reliable sources. The information contained herein is not guaranteed by Provise Management Group, LLC as to accuracy, does not purport to be complete and is not intended to be used as a primary basis for investment decisions. The indices mentioned are unmanaged and cannot be directly invested into. ProVise is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of these Bullets should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of ProVise’s current written disclosure discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request. If you do not want to receive the ProVise Bullets, please contact us at: info@provise.com or call: (727) 441-9022. Please visit our Web Site at: www.provise.com.


Notice: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please accept this as notice that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the information contained in this transmission is strictly prohibited. NFP reserves the right, to the extent and under circumstances permitted by applicable law, to retain, monitor and intercept e-mail messages to and from its systems.

Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and do not necessarily express those of NFP. Although this transmission and any attachment are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by NFP, its subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

 

(c) ProVise Management Group

www.provise.com

 


 

Display as PDF     Print    Email Article    Remind Me Later
 
Remember, if you have a question or comment, send it to .
Website by the Boston Web Company