Our Job: Whether; Market's Job: When
Smead Capital Management
By Bill Smead
February 13, 2013
Fellow Investors:
Warren Buffett describes the stock market's purpose as being "a wonderfully efficient mechanism for transferring
wealth from the impatient to the patient". We are reminded
of this by a series of news reports and commentaries on subjects greatly
influenced by basic economics. In today's missive, we consider what the
law of supply and demand says about China,
oil, and housing in the USA.
Question
number one: will China's proliferating debt and Swiss cheese banking
system lead to a deep recession/depression and economic cleansing in
China?
In a recent report titled, Feeding The Dragon,
GMO's Edward Chancellor explains the frailty and danger in China's financial system. Here is his list of problems:
· Excessive credit growth (combined with an epic real estate boom)
· Moral hazard (i.e., the very widespread belief that Beijing has underwritten all bank risk)
· Related-party lending (to local government infrastructure projects)
· Loan forbearance (aka “evergreening” of local government loans)
· De facto financial liberalization (which has accompanied the growth of the shadow banking system)
· Ponzi finance (i.e., the need for rising asset prices to validate wealth management products and trust loans)
· An increase in bank off-balance-sheet exposures (masking a rise in leverage)
· Duration mismatches and roll-over risk (owing to short wealth management product maturities)
· Contagion risk (posed by credit guarantee networks)
· Widespread financial fraud and corruption (from fake valuations on collateral to mis-selling of financial products)
At
Smead Capital Management we believe it is not a question of whether
China will face a hard landing, it is a question of when. Despite
three-plus years
of warning from Chancellor, Michael Pettis of Peking University, Jim
Chanos, Andy Xie, and others, most investors in the US assume they are
wrong or just ignore the risk. Such a myopic view brings to mind Federal
Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan’s 1996 remarks
to The American Enterprise Group, where he warned that markets were
suffering from "irrational exuberance". He was referring to the building
enthusiasm for tech stocks and the US stock market in general. The tech
stocks and the S&P 500 index didn't crack until
March 10, 2000. However, it would have been wise to heed his warning;
US Stocks suffered two 40 percent bear markets, a lost decade, and just
recently approached early 2000 levels.
All
uninterrupted economic booms culminating in unbalanced use of fixed
asset investments have busted in recorded economic history. China's
version of economic
boom will be no different, in our opinion. Standard and Poor’s reported
on the $2.5 trillion of stimulus loans made by the four largest Chinese
banks from 2008-2011. They estimated that 30 percent of those loans
won’t be repaid. It means that $750 billion of loan write downs are
attached to buildings and other infrastructure projects,
which have little rent to service debt. If China's four largest banks
admitted their existing level of non-performing loans and marked them to
the market, we believe they would have negative net worth already. It
is interesting that when your regulator is
your owner (the government), a blind eye is applied to delinquent loans
and property with no rent to service your debts.
Question
number two: Will a massive increase in oil supplies, record-setting gas
mileage improvements in autos and China's eventual bust cause a big
decline
in oil prices?
We
believe that dramatically lower oil prices are on the way. At the end
of 1995, I remember a survey on what mattered to auto buyers. It showed
that gas
mileage was 24th in importance in a list of 25 automobile
attributes. I also remember how popular the seven-passenger Chevy
Suburban was for moms with an average of two kids. The gas mileage was
about 11 in city and 14 on the highway. The combination
of disinterest in mpg and gas guzzling vehicle popularity convinced me
that oil prices were ultimately headed higher. A few years later in
December of 1998, oil bottomed at $11.28 per barrel of West Texas
Intermediate crude oil. It took about the same time
to make the turn for oil prices that it did for turning the stock
market in the late 1990's.
A recent survey by Consumer Reports showed that gas mileage is at the top of car shopper
concerns and Americans have significantly reduced gasoline use for four
years. In the survey, 37% of those interviewed thought gas mileage was
most important in buying a car. This was followed by quality at 14%. In
our opinion, combining the Texas oil boom
with the Bakken field/Canadian shale oil boom and you’ll have the
Malthusian Peak Oil theorists headed for another crushing defeat. Lower
oil prices are a matter of “when” not “whether”, in our view.
Question
number three: Will the aging of the “echo boomers” trigger a strong
enough housing cycle to return the US economy to normal?
A
number of sources have estimated that echo-boomers make up over 25
percent of the US population (people between the ages of 18-35). What do
we know about
people with and average age of 28? First, they form households. The
Department of Labor reported recently that in the year ended September
30, 2012, 1.15 million new households were formed in the US. This was up
from an average of 650,000 over the three prior
years. As of the 2011 Census,
men marry for the first time at an average
age of 28.9 and Women marry at the average age of 26.9. Second, the
mid- 20’s is the beginning of most of the baby making among married
couples in the US. The average age of a first child for married couples
in the US was 24.9 in 2009. Third, the baby causes
the family to want a stand-alone home. And fourth, the first baby and
affordable stand-alone home causes the demand for roomier and multiple
automobiles.
We
know that the financial meltdown of 2008 and high unemployment of
2009-11 pushed back marriage plans, baby-making, and first-time home
buying. We believe
it has laid the groundwork for the unleashing of “pent-up” demand for
houses and family-oriented vehicles. Housing and autos are the
traditional drivers of US economic growth. Blue collar labor is
integrally tied to home building, building materials, home
furnishing, and auto manufacturing.
This is the first recession in our lifetime whose recovery was not led by housing. In 1977, US census data showed that the US population was around 220 million. Single
family housing starts in 1978 were
over 1.4 million. In 2011, the US had 315 million people and 430,000
housing starts. The overhanging supply of foreclosed homes is
disappearing as housing starts are exceeded by household formation.
Therefore, we believe it is only a question of “when” single
family housing starts exceed one million and not a question of
“whether”.
In
summary, we at Smead Capital Management believe that China will land
hard, oil will decline in price and housing will make a comeback. We
don’t get to
know exactly when and will remain diligently patient for the markets to
render their timing. We believe that the US economy is the place to be
the next five to ten years and domestically-oriented common stocks will
outperform those predicated on continued
success for the emerging markets like China.
William Smead
The
information contained in this missive represents SCM's opinions, and
should not be construed as personalized or individualized
investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
It should not be assumed that investing in any securities mentioned
above will or will not be profitable. A list of all recommendations made
by Smead Capital Management within the past
twelve month period is available upon request.
(c) Smead Capital Management

