Math, History and Psychology - Part 2
Smead Capital Management
By Bill Smead
July 5, 2012
Dear Fellow Investors:
Last
week we wrote about the math of common stock investing and the
effectiveness of mathematical discipline to portfolio management. This
week we
will focus on history and the importance of that academic discipline to
us as common stock portfolio managers here at Smead Capital Management
(SCM).
Edmund
Burke said, “Those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it.” We
at SCM like to think in terms of taking advantage of what we know about
history to make money owning good quality common stocks. Mark Twain
said, “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme!” We believe
these are the most important statements on how history should affect
portfolio management decisions. In our opinion, you
must know the history of the markets and you must trust the “rhymes” to
be effective and successful.
We
will use some historical examples to back up Burke and Twain’s
argument. History shows that there have been regular bouts of financial
euphoria.
In his book, “A Short History of Financial Euphoria”, John Kenneth
Galbraith used the Tulip Mania of the 17th century and the “South Sea Bubble” of the 18th century to help people understand how dangerous excessive optimism is
in business.
The aftermath of these speculative episodes was drastic and
debilitating losses. Here is how Galbraith described the lead up into
the height of the euphoria:
“The
price of the object of speculation goes up. Securities, land, objects
d’art, and other property, when bought today are worth more tomorrow.
This increase and the prospect attract new buyers; the new buyers
assure a further increase. Yet more are attracted; yet buy; the increase
continues. The speculation building on itself provides its own
momentum.
This
process, once it is recognized, is clearly evident, and especially so
after the fact. So also, if more subjectively, are the basic attitudes
of the participants. These take two forms. There are those who are
persuaded that some new price-enhancing circumstance is in control, and
they expect the market to stay up and go up, perhaps indefinitely. It is
adjusting to a new situation, a new world of
greatly, even infinitely increasing returns and resulting values. Then
there are those, superficially more astute and generally fewer in
number, who perceive or believe themselves to perceive the speculative
mood of the moment. They are in to ride the upward
wave; their particular genius, they are convinced, will allow them to
get out before the speculation runs its course. They will get the
maximum reward from the increase as it continues; they will be out
before the eventual fall.”
History
shows that these speculative episodes will happen and those who know
history are to avoid participation in these episodes. It was tulips
in the Netherlands, common stock in the South Seas, Western Railroads
in the 1860’s and 1870’s, technology like cars, planes and radios in the
1920’s, the internet in the late 1990’s and residential real estate in
2005. We believe you must understand and know
the history of these events and avoid participation in them once they
get speculative!
Folks
have wondered why we believe that China’s economy and their miraculous
last thirty years of economic growth aren’t sustainable. The answer
is simple. CHINA HAS ALREADY QUALIFIED AS THE BENEFICIARY OF A
SPECULATIVE EPISODE. THIS KIND OF UNINTERRUPTED ECONOMIC SUCCESS HAS
ALWAYS ENDED BADLY IN ALL RECORDED ECONOMIC HISTORY! China has not had
an economic contraction in thirty years. As Galbraith
pointed out, China is in a new world of greatly, even infinitely
increasing returns and resulting values. In China, it’s all about GDP
growth, because their internal stock market broke down four years ago
and even that has not stopped the euphoria associated
with China’s future. The speculative episode just moved to houses from
stocks in China.
The
most successful economy of all time, the US economy, grew 9% compounded
from 1800 to 1900. However, there were 18 recessions, 3 depressions and
3 all-out panics. The economy was cleansed of its sins by regular
economic contractions. As Warren Buffett says, “Only when the tide goes
out do you discover who is swimming naked.” In China, the tide has never
been allowed to go out. Bad loans, fraud and
poor investments have never been exposed and the masses have not been
forced to learn and improve their economic behavior.
This
is why Twain’s quote about history rhyming is so important. Every time
that one of these episodes comes along, investors and professional
portfolio
managers focus on the difference in the current episode to the past
ones. History repeats itself, but not identically! Therefore, the
temptation is to focus on the difference and repeat the mistakes. This
is true at both positive and negative extremes. A
few examples might be helpful.
We
were in a deep recession with as high as 10.8% unemployment in 1981-82.
Incredibly high interest rates crippled the economy and smokestack
America.
Budget deficits were high and the US national debt grew immensely.
Stocks were out of favor and 1981-82 was a great time to buy many good
quality common stocks.
Along
came the meltdown of 2007-2009, with a deep recession which included
10% unemployment. Very few professional investors were buyers or holders
of good quality common stocks back in late 2008 or early 2009. The 2009
market bottom was triggered by too much debt and the massive
deleveraging which has occurred since then. Everyone told us not to buy
because, “It’s different this time.” In 1981-82 it
was the price of money which crippled the economy and in 2009 it was
the huge principle balances which crippled it.
Fortunately
for us and unfortunately for those who couldn’t sense the rhyme, 2009
was a great time to buy good quality US common stocks. Those who
focused on the differences and ignored the rhyme missed the entire
comeback the stock market has made since March of 2009. It grieves us to
see the massive amount of capital which resides in doomsday-oriented
mutual funds and ETFs, whose path to success would
be our country’s failure to make a full comeback in this deleveraging
process. So far, the optimists have outperformed and the 1982 playbook
proved to be effective.
We
believe the latest history to trust is the rhyme between the US economy
and stock market in 1952 and today. In both cases, the US economy had
high unemployment, huge government debt, massive recent stimulus, the
Federal Reserve Board capping long-term interest rates, historically
high profits as a percentage of GDP and what we believe are cheap
large-cap stocks. Back then we funded the Marshall
Plan to help Europe and Japan, as well as the GI Bill. Today, it is
enormous unemployment compensation and deficit spending. Despite all
those headwinds and a reversion to the mean in corporate profits as a
percentage of GDP, the Dow Jones Industrial Average
rose from 260 in 1952 to near 1000 in 1966. Those who ignored the
headwinds created wealth and those who sat on the sidelines or hoped to
make money from the misery of others ended up poorer. Will those
circumstances play out differently this time? Or will
this situation rhyme with 1952? At SCM, we are paid to trust the
rhymes!
Here is how Galbraith concluded his thesis on the history of euphoria:
“At
the risk of repetition—restatement of what one hopes is now evident—let
the lessons be summarized. The circumstances that induce the recurrent
lapses into financial dementia have not changed in any truly operative
fashion since the Tulip Mania of 1636-37. Individuals and institutions
are captured by the wondrous satisfaction from accruing wealth. The
associated illusion of insight is protected, in
turn by the oft-noted public impression that intelligence, one’s own
and that of others, marches in close step with the possession of money.
Out of that belief, thus instilled, then comes action—the bidding up of
values, whether in land, securities, or, as
recently, art. The upward movement confirms the commitment to personal
and group wisdom. And so on to the moment of mass disillusion and the
crash. This last, it will now be sufficiently evident, never comes
gently. It is always accompanied by a desperate
and largely unsuccessful effort to get out.”
Next week we will talk about psychology.
Best Wishes,
William Smead
The information contained in this missive represents SCM's opinions, and should not be construed as personalized or individualized investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All of the securities identified and described in this missive are a sample of issuers being currently recommended for suitable clients as of the date stated in this missive and do not represent all of the securities purchased or recommended for our clients. It should not be assumed that investing in these securities was or will be profitable. A list of all recommendations made by Smead Capital Management within the past twelve month period is available upon request.
(c) Smead Capital Management

