Hydro-carbon-phobia

August 14th, 2013

by Eric Schaefer

A veritable torrent of news must have hit the media on August 1st. How else then can one possibly explain its collective silence greeting the Energy Information Agency's (EIA) release of its annual estimate of U.S. oil reserves.

Its report contains enough good news to fill several days of cable news time. The EIA estimates oil exploration and production companies added 3.8 Billion barrels of proved oil reserves in 2011. This is a 15% increase over the agency's 2010 estimate of total proved of 25.2 Billion barrels. The jump reported is by no means an isolated event: from 2009 to 2011, the proved reserve estimate has risen by a staggering 8.4 Billion barrels. The good news extended to natural gas as well. Proved reserves of wet rose by 10% to 348.8 Trillion cubic feet.

Readers of this publication will not be surprised by either the huge jump in proved reserves or the deafening silence in the media. In our second issue -- "From Scarcity to Abundance?", dated August 18th, 2011 -- we introduced readers to the revolution in the Bakken formation spanning North Dakota and portions of Montana and Canada's Saskatchewan Province. Two years may seem like the blink of an eye but it is a veritable geological epoch in the time span of the hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling. If practice makes perfect, then with each well drilled, proficiency is enhanced and the nation comes one step closer to energy self-sufficiency.

The upward revision in reserves is mirrored in the production volumes. Over the 12 months ending May, U.S. oil production surpassed 2.5 Billion barrels. This volume is a 15% increase over the prior fiscal year ending May 2012; and, it is a 21% increase over fiscal year May 2003 totals. In the past ten years North Dakota -- the center of the tight oil boom -- has jumped from the 11th largest U.S. oil producing region to the 3rd. The state now eclipses California, the Alaskan North Slope and Louisiana in the rankings. Only Texas (number 1) and the Gulf Off Shore (number 2) surpass North Dakota's 272 Million barrels pumped in the 12 months ending May 2013.

Has the revolution peaked? By no means. On the horizon we see two other unconventional hydrocarbon plays with the potential to further disrupt the OPEC establishment. The U.S. will participate in both as will other nations around the globe. One is oil shale. Now, oil shale is not to be confused with shale oil (or, tight oil in the industry). It is more akin to tar sands. Unlike tar sands, no economically viable production method currently exists. Twenty years ago the same was once true for shale oil. So, do not discount technology.

The other is methane hydrates, popularly known as "fire ice". The saying goes, necessity is the mother of invention. If so, this explains the keen interest of both Japan and South Korea in making the technological leaps needed to convert the stuff of science fiction into the energy source of tomorrow. Both countries are industrial titans lacking any indigenous energy reserves. Methane hydrates offer both the potential to sever their reliance on imported energy. Our best guess is within a generation Japan will begin mining fire ice in sufficient quantities from its continental shelf to fuel its factories, power plants and cars.

So why the media silence? Because it does not fit the narrative supporting alternative energy. Promoters have relied on a double barreled shotgun in their arguments for wind and solar. One barrel is loaded with climate change data; the other with peak oil statistics. It appears now oil has not peaked. Conventional sources may be waning but unconventional sources are growing. With liquid hydrocarbons becoming more abundant, one impetus for subjecting the economy to a wrenching change is gone. With only one bullet left, the fear of losing the battle grows. The unfolding debate regarding the Keystone XL project will reveal just how rabid the media (and, the administration's) phobia to hydrocarbons has become.


Notes on Sources, Methods and Definitions:

Based on production data ending May 2013 for all U.S. Petroleum Administration for Defense Districts (PADD). Volumes include lease condensates. This term describes oil existing in a gaseous state when underground but which condenses to a liquid at normal atmospheric pressure.

The Energy Information Agency (EIA) is an arm of the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE).

(Sources: EIA; AIFS estimates.)


About American Independence Financial Services, LLC

American Independence Financial Services, LLC ("AIFS") is the investment adviser and administrator for the American Independence Funds. The firm is a limited liability company founded in 2004. It is majority owned by its senior management, who average over 25 plus years of industry experience and achievement. Today AIFS offers eight different mutual funds and manages approximately $1.1 Billion in assets on behalf of its clients.

Our "partnership" culture and boutique size helps keep us focused on finding investment managers and strategies which offer a real choice in the marketplace. We strive to deliver active management which beats passively managed alternatives over time. We also seek strategies which are innovative and address investors’ needs.

We believe our lineup of investment strategies reflects our unique worldview. We invite you to visit our website www.aifunds.com to learn more about us and to discover our independent perspective on investing.

Important Disclosures

© 2013, American Independence Financial Services (AIFS). All rights reserved. Redistribution and quotation permitted with attribution to the author and source.

The views expressed in this document are based on political, market, economic and other conditions subject to change at any time. Data are acquired from sources believed to be reliable. But no warranties are made to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the data and information presented. Opinions expressed are those of the author unless indicated to the contrary. Nothing in this document should be construed or taken as financial or investment advice. Please consult with your financial advisor to discuss how the subject of this research report may impact your unique, individual circumstances.

Certain indices, yields, exchange rates and other market and economic statistics may be quoted or mentioned in this report. You can not invest directly in an index; nor can you obtain many of the other yields or rates quoted. Please bear in mind such indices and other statistics do not include many of the expenses associated with investing in securities including (but not limited to) trading costs, custodial fees and management fees. All index results cited in this document reflect returns including the impact of re-invested dividend or interest payments expressed in US Dollar terms unless noted to the contrary.

Investors should understand and consider these and other risks they may face by investing in the Funds. These risks are discussed more fully in the Funds' prospectus. Investors are encouraged to read the prospectus.

For more complete information on the American Independence Funds, you can obtain a prospectus containing complete information for the funds by calling 1-866-410-2006, or by visiting www.aifunds.com. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. You should consider the fund's investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before you invest or send money. Information about these and other important subjects is in the Funds' prospectus.

Income taxes may be due on all or a portion of the interest, dividends or capital gains received or realized through an investment in a mutual fund. Please consult with your tax advisor to discuss how different investments may affect your tax liability.

Shares of the American Independence Funds are distributed by Matrix Capital Group, Inc., which is not affiliated with American Independence Financial Services, LLC.

Not FDIC Insured - May Lose Value - No Bank Guarantee

Website by the Boston Web Company