ACTIONABLE ADVICE FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORS: Newsletters and Commentaries Focused on Investment Strategy

    Last 14 days

Most Popular Articles


Most Popular Commentaries

    Last 12 Months

Most Popular Articles


Most Popular Commentaries



More by the Same Author

Investing
   Investment Themes
Asset Class
   Alternatives
Assessing New Tools to Protect Against
Tail-Risk Events
By Jerry A. Miccolis, CFA®, CFP®, FCAS, MAAA
February 15, 2011

Go to page 2, 3, Next          Bookmark and Share  Email Article   Display as PDF


Advisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.

Jerry Miccolis

Protecting against sudden, severe market drops is as crucial as it is difficult.  A plethora of approaches to this problem have been brought to market in last few years, and to evaluate them my firm, Brinton Eaton Wealth Advisors, developed a set of rigorous criteria. These criteria led us to a solution that works for us and for our clients, and I’d like to share our approach with you.

In the wake of the market devastation that took place in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, we, like many firms, increased our attention to tail-risk hedging.  While carefully designed asset allocation and opportunistic rebalancing repeatedly got our clients through other bear markets, big and small, the contagion that roiled the markets during those infamous six months – when virtually every asset class suffered simultaneously – was quite another matter. The crisis rendered those time-tested approaches temporarily impotent. 

Clearly, we needed something else to supplement traditional portfolio risk management.

One approach is tactical maneuvering (sometimes referred to as “dynamic asset allocation”).  This article is not about that; it’s about another class of solutions – tail-risk hedging – that come to the rescue automatically and do not require active intervention.

After the financial crisis, many among the multitude of solutions and quasi-solutions that came to market played on investor fears.  Against this barrage, we made sure we had very stringent criteria to clearly articulate what we wanted – and did not want – in a solution.  Most failed one or more of our requirements, but we did find some very promising approaches.  In this article, I’ll explain how we applied our criteria to critically evaluate a number of proposed solutions.

Go to page 2, 3, Next     

Display article as PDF for printing.

Would you like to send this article to a friend?

Remember, if you have a question or comment, send it to .
Website by the Boston Web Company