ACTIONABLE ADVICE FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORS: Newsletters and Commentaries Focused on Investment Strategy

    Last 14 days

Most Popular Articles


Most Popular Commentaries

    Last 12 Months

Most Popular Articles


Most Popular Commentaries



More by the Same Author

Equities
   Common
Your Top Priority Should Be Your Top Priority
By Justin Locke
May 17, 2011

Next page     Bookmark and Share  Email Article   Display as PDF


Advisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.

Justin Locke

How do you determine your top priority? 

Too often, leaders get bogged down by routine, and they fail to meaningfully answer that question.

One’s top priority may be simple and obvious, but often it is glaringly difficult to confront.  Fear of the impediments to tackling key priorities head-on has spawned an entire economy of lower-level alternative approaches that promise faster results with less effort.  With so many people earnestly selling so many tips and tricks that promise a simple and easy fix, it is very easy to eagerly latch on to one of them and fall into what I call the rut of the “if-then” statement. 

For example, a common if-then statement goes something like this: “If we remove all defects, then our customers will be thrilled.”  This sounds great on paper.  It guarantees success without too much nasty introspection, and it sounds even better when you realize that it frees you from actually listening to what all those pesky customers have to say. 

When an if-then policy like this gets adopted, everyone mindlessly focuses on removing defects and forgets the highest priority – actually satisfying customers.  Your customers may not care about minor defects.  Instead, they may want your product in a different color, or maybe they just want someone to talk to them.  Sadly, the if-then statement makes us focus on a lower priority, defect removal, and we lose track of the highest priority, improving the customer’s overall experience. 

When I was a professional double-bass player, I often performed for conductors who were stuck on an if-then statement.  One conductor adopted a truly wacky and totally unique policy: His bass players must vibrato on every note.  (Vibrato refers to moving the left hand to create voice-like oscillations in pitch.)  His theory: “If the bass player vibratos, then the whole show will be better.” 

But this was a performance of Swan Lake, and in a ballet pit orchestra, vibrato by the bass players is meaningless.  It is far more important that the bass players crank out as much volume as possible, so the violas and the dancers can hear the downbeats.  Vibrato actually diminishes volume, and when you’re playing a low F on a string bass in a pit, no one (myself included) can hear vibrato anyway. 

Display article as PDF for printing.

Would you like to send this article to a friend?

Remember, if you have a question or comment, send it to .
Website by the Boston Web Company