ACTIONABLE ADVICE FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORS: Newsletters and Commentaries Focused on Investment Strategy

Follow us on
 Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  RSS Feed

    Last 14 days

Most Popular Articles


Most Popular Commentaries

    Last 12 Months

Most Popular Articles


Most Popular Commentaries



More by the Same Author

Annuities
   Immediate
Economic Insights
   Employment
   Expansion
   Monetary Policy
   Recession
Economics
   Economics
Equities
   Growth
Investment Strategies
   General
Practice Management
   Operations
US Economy
   US Economy
Bruce Greenwald on Structural Imbalances
in the Economy
By Eric Uhlfelder
April 24, 2012

Go to page 2, 3, Next          Bookmark and Share  Email Article   Display as PDF   Remind Me Later


Bruce Greenwald

Bruce Greenwald likes to say that he is constituted to disagree with everybody about everything, and he was true to his word at the recent Hyman P. Minksy Conference in New York. Taking immediate exception with the virtually unanimous characterization of the economic crisis as a balance-sheet recession, Greenwald, a professor of finance at Columbia University, argued that, far from being unusual, balance-sheet recessions can in fact be found at the heart of almost all business cycles. 

Greenwald’s talk reflected research he has done with Joseph Stiglitz, his colleague at Columbia and the 2001 Nobel Prize recipient in economics.

The upshot of Greenwald’s talk was that, although we are technically out of recession, troubling structural imbalances remain and continue to drag down growth and employment. I’ll discuss Greenwald’s current sentiments more later, but first let’s examine the general outlook that led Greenwald to his conclusions – his views, true to his contrarian image, are unconventional.

A Minskian view of recessions

Greenwald’s view of recessions coincides with the outlook of Minsky – the late namesake of the conference at which he spoke, who was most famous for arguing that financial stability, fragility, and even crisis are all parts of the natural economic cycle.

Recessions occur in Minskian fashion, Greenwald argued as risk-taking ratchets up as euphoria grows, until the cyclical nature of expansion causes it to tail off.  The gap between excess capacity and demand widens, and businesses begin to pay the costs of overleveraged balance sheets.  Equity profit-taking accelerates the cycle’s turn, eventually triggering panic and significant market sell-offs.

The classic Minsky recession, therefore, is a short sharp recession followed by a long, slow recovery.  Companies reduce investment in working capital – physical plant, equipment, and hiring – which cuts output, Greenwald said.  Over time, losses slow and cash flow improves as balance sheet health gets restored.  Then, according to Greenwald, as firms recover and get better recapitalized, they look to sail close to the wind again, until the next shock occurs. 

This is why recessions will always be a fact of life.

But hold on.  Is this crisis – marked by protracted high unemployment, even as corporations have gotten healthier and accumulated soaring cash reserves – a Minskian balance sheet crisis?

Greenwald concluded no.  “There is something much more striking going on,” he said.

Go to page 2, 3, Next     

Display article as PDF for printing.

Would you like to send this article to a friend?

Remember, if you have a question or comment, send it to .
Website by the Boston Web Company