ACTIONABLE ADVICE FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORS: Newsletters and Commentaries Focused on Investment Strategy

Follow us on
 Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  RSS Feed

    Last 14 days

Most Popular Articles


Most Popular Commentaries

    Last 12 Months

Most Popular Articles


Most Popular Commentaries



More by the Same Author

Equities
   Common
Investment Strategies
   Portfolio Management
Specialty Investments
   Gold
Six Technology Integration Disasters to Avoid
By Jennifer Goldman
November 6, 2012

Go to page 2, 3, Next          Bookmark and Share  Email Article   Display as PDF   Remind Me Later


Advisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives. 

Jennifer Goldman

Technology integration is the Holy Grail for today’s top-performing financial advisors. When applications talk to each other, advisors can run their practices more efficiently, save money and reduce the size of their staff.  That all sounds great, but I’m writing to offer a word of caution: I’ve seen many such efforts end in disaster. 

Unfortunately, not all technology integrations are necessary or even desirable. All too often, technology vendors tout integration that doesn’t save time or reduce labor, costing advisors money that could be spent elsewhere. For advisors, an ill-advised upgrade typically stems from confusion about what technology integration actually means and the benefits that can realistically be gained from it.

I’ll offer some tips for avoiding common technology integration mistakes, but first let’s review what we’re dealing with when we talk about integrative technology.

What are we talking about?

Integrated technology solutions come in two forms. The first is a bundled solution, whereby applications that fulfill different functions get repackaged together. The second form is keeping separately purchased individual applications separate, but introducing the ability to communicate among them.

Let’s divide the actual functionality of the technology integration you might consider into three categories:

  • Single sign-on:  An advisor can open another software program from within the primary software program without having to type in a login and password; the two applications don’t necessarily talk to each other or share data, however.
  • Manual sync:  Two software programs share data, but you have to push a button to move the data back and forth.
  • Auto sync:  Two software programs are tightly linked, automatically sharing data without any human effort.

“When considering technology integration, the most important factor is to focus on what you need and what makes sense,” said Mary Ferguson, CEO at Concenter Services, LLC. “There is some integration that sounds good, but doesn’t make sense. It is all too easy for advisors to sign on for something that they really don’t need and won’t help them become more efficient.”

Go to page 2, 3, Next     

Display article as PDF for printing.

Would you like to send this article to a friend?

Remember, if you have a question or comment, send it to .
Website by the Boston Web Company