ACTIONABLE ADVICE FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORS: Newsletters and Commentaries Focused on Investment Strategy

Follow us on
 Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  RSS Feed

    Last 14 days

Most Popular Articles


Most Popular Commentaries

    Last 12 Months

Most Popular Articles


Most Popular Commentaries



More by the Same Author

Annuities
   Immediate
Economic Insights
   Inflation
Economics
   Economics
Equities
   Value
Financial Planning
   Financial Planning
   Retirement Income
General Advisory
   Behavioral Finance
   Foundations
Investment Strategies
   Asset Allocation
Investments
   Annuities
   Investments
Market Insights
   Fixed Income
Specialty Investments
   Balanced
The Safety-first, Goals-based Approach
to Financial Planning
By Wade Pfau
February 14, 2012

Go to page 2, 3, Next          Bookmark and Share  Email Article   Display as PDF


Little of what is taught in traditional investment textbooks is of value in personal financial planning. Risk is not standard deviation; it is the probability and consequences of not meeting one’s goals.  That real-world perspective animates a new book by Zvi Bodie and Rachelle Taqqu that implores advisors and their clients to lock in the funding of their essential expenses before worrying about their discretionary goals.

Bodie’s and Taqqu’s Risk Less and Prosper: Your Guide to Safer Investing, helps bring the safety-first, goals-based investment portfolio approach to the forefront of financial planning, especially when it comes to preparing for retirement. The idea from which the book proceeds is to focus on retirement spending goals and to decide what is essential and what is discretionary. Essential spending needs should be locked in by funding them with safe investments – the sort that cannot possibly fail to achieve clearly defined goals – while more discretionary and aspirational retirement expenditures are funded with volatile assets that allow for a chance that risks manifest and goals are not met. By considering both future income and future expenses, those looking ahead to retirement can develop a strategy to meet their goals while taking as little risk as possible.

What’s new, and what’s not

For clients to whom the guiding principles of a safety-first, flooring approach to retirement planning are brand-new, Bodie’s and Taqqu’s book provides an effective introduction. Though in some ways client-centric, however, for advisors the book helpfully synthesizes several different approaches that can help to build an advisor’s retirement planning toolkit. Advisors looking for a more detailed manual spelling out the flooring approach, however, may be better served by Michael J. Zwecher’s Retirement Portfolios: Theory, Construction, and Management. Bodie and Taqqu focus more on the intuition of flooring.

They also specifically emphasize the use of inflation-protected bonds (TIPS and I Bonds) to create inflation-adjusted flooring. The focus on TIPS follows from Bodie’s and Michael J. Clowes’ 2003 book, Worry-Free Investing: A Safe Approach to Achieving Your Lifetime Financial Goals, but the newer book expands beyond TIPS to also consider single-premium immediate annuities, a means of protecting against longevity risk past the bond ladder’s terminal date.

Bodie and Taqqu also describe a lifetime approach to broader financial planning, adopting some features found in Dan Nevin’s Goals-based Investing: Integrating Traditional and Behavioral Finance from the spring 2004 Journal of Wealth Management. These features include allowing for mental accounting so that different goals (retirement vs. children’s education, for instance), are funded with separate portfolios, as well as the emphasis on distinguishing needs from wants. The broader message is also shared with goals-based investing: The objective is not to maximize returns or to beat a benchmark, but rather to find investments that will help to reach financial goals with as little risk as possible.

Bodie and Taqqu also emphasize the inclusion of human capital in the lifetime balance sheet. Lifetime assets, including both financial assets and potential future earnings, must balance lifetime liabilities (retirement spending, spending on other goals, pre-retirement spending). More risk can be taken both when the time horizon is longer (because this provides more opportunities to adapt and save) and when income is more flexible (because this provides opportunities to work more should investment risk manifest).

Go to page 2, 3, Next     

Display article as PDF for printing.

Would you like to send this article to a friend?

Remember, if you have a question or comment, send it to .
Website by the Boston Web Company